And if we knew, who would pay him to really be creative???
I am impressed by the stark contrast between churches of past ages and those of today. Compare the two images below for instance….
While each have unique architectural beauty, it’s hard to deny the Sistine Chapel’s emphasis on art vs. the more modern example. I see this reflected time-and-time again today in evangelical churches of all sizes. Now I am very thankful that churches today are not typically built by extorting money out of believers who are lead to trust their eternity to purchased indulgences. But at the same time, the amount of artwork that goes into the design and appointment of churches today has drastically decreased. Many churches are more like sterile convention centers than facilities that evoke a sense of reverence and inspire worship by virtue of their design. I’ve not been in the Sistine Chapel, but I’ve been any many sanctuaries based on old world design. Almost without fail they stir up worship and awe in my heart. Their architecture, stained-glass, artistic depictions of Biblical events, even the symbolism of candles, and the fragrance of incense bring me into worship naturally. This doesn’t happen when I enter a tilt-up concrete structure with a drywall interior, folding chairs and indoor-outdoor carpeting. This doesn’t mean God’s in the old church but absent in the new. In fact, God’s everywhere. But art and design can remind us of His presence.
This goes deeper than just how we design. I think it goes to what skills and talents we value and cultivate in the church. It’s impressive to note that many of the greatest artists, musicians and composers made part or all of their living through the church. Michelangelo, Bach, Mozart and countless others whose names we may not even know.
So what has changed? Why have we gone from frescoes to acoustic tile?Surely there are lots of reasons, some practical, perhaps even theological. One is probably man’s ever-decreasing patience. Remember that many old world cathedrals actually took generations to complete. Those who commissioned, designed and broke ground knew they’d never see the finished structure. What pastor would propose a building project like that today? We’re very impatient. On the theological side, there’s also the fact that Puritan traditions of simplicity still exert a powerful influence on evangelical churches today. But it’s broader than just that. you can see it outside the church too. Compare an old metropolitan bank building to one built in the last few years. Stone pillars and marble floors have been replaced by cheaper, far less ornate structural elements.
So maybe it’s not just the church. Perhaps the world is just becoming a less beautiful place. I believe this is reflected not only in the look of what mankind builds, but also in the fact our geographic expansion is simply paving-over creation — God’s handiwork. In that light, my strong conviction is that the church has an opportunity, even an obligation, to further set itself apart as a haven of beauty, art, music, and all manner of soulful expressions of truth, edification and worship. As the longest book in the Bible, Psalms, is a collection of lyrics and poetry. So the church should elevate the arts to be among the most important and prominent fruits of its efforts. Not the onlyfruit mind you, but a larger part than it currently represents. My personal experience has been that artists are most often treated as “resources” the church can use to set the stage for pastors to teach rather than seeing them as the means by which God can reach directly into the hearts of believers to draw true worship while allowing non-believers to encounter the Holy Spirit directly. Having experienced being a part of both artistic ministries and teaching ministries, I am interested in the differences in how they’re shepherded. In teaching-oriented ministries there is at least some measure of effort placed into building the necessary competence, theological understanding, devotional habits, accountability and discipleship skills. While in artistic ministry there is little, if any, focus on these things. The result of this is that the artistic community within the church is often not equally grounded spiritually, not truly equipped for ministry. The sad result of this is the number of moral failures I’ve seen among the ranks of artists. Crisis proportions in my view. While ultimately these are personal failures, the church bares a degree of responsibility as well. But the natural result of this is for church leadership to place less trust in the spiritual strength of their artists. A sad vicious cycle begins if we’re not careful.
There is hope though… there always is, because God is faithful even when we are not. I am encouraged that church leadership titles like “song leader” or even “director of music” are often being replaced by “pastor of worship arts” and a host of other titles that elevate the position and broaden its scope beyond just that of music. Of course, God cares nothing about titles, nor should we. But it represents a shift in thinking and a resetting of goals. Whether or not actual expectations, practices and results have changed is another matter. Success in this I think is far less common. What is required is not changes of title or even liturgical structure (though that may be a result.) As much as it might sound like I’m pinning the responsibility for change on senior church leadership, I’m not. Actually I think the change needs to start within the community of Christian artists and those who are responsible for music and artistic ministry. Recognize the awesome role you can play in the church. Certainly the support of the rest of church leadership will be needed along the way, but we need to demonstrate the impact we can have as we go. We also need to do the hard work of discipleship within our ranks. Of course, this starts with building habits in our own lives that match the lyrics we sing. Do we live like we’re “in love with Jesus?” Is He the air we “breath?” Do we honestly seek that He “open the eyes of our hearts?” As we seek to live it personally and then to sew it within the community of artists around us, God will elevate the resulting ministry. He loves to receive the praises of His people. No one is better equipped to express His praise than the artistic heart!
What is required of church leadership is to recognize that there is an artistic community around them. By nature, they’re among the least likely to assert their presence. But they have a unique and irreplaceable role in the church. Make sure you are seeking to grow, disciple, nurture, build, and use this community to glory of God.
In comments, I’d love to hear about places where this is going well.
I am impressed by the stark contrast between churches of past ages and those of today. Compare the two images below for instance….
This goes deeper than just how we design. I think it goes to what skills and talents we value and cultivate in the church. It’s impressive to note that many of the greatest artists, musicians and composers made part or all of their living through the church. Michelangelo, Bach, Mozart and countless others whose names we may not even know.
So what has changed? Why have we gone from frescoes to acoustic tile?Surely there are lots of reasons, some practical, perhaps even theological. One is probably man’s ever-decreasing patience. Remember that many old world cathedrals actually took generations to complete. Those who commissioned, designed and broke ground knew they’d never see the finished structure. What pastor would propose a building project like that today? We’re very impatient. On the theological side, there’s also the fact that Puritan traditions of simplicity still exert a powerful influence on evangelical churches today. But it’s broader than just that. you can see it outside the church too. Compare an old metropolitan bank building to one built in the last few years. Stone pillars and marble floors have been replaced by cheaper, far less ornate structural elements.
So maybe it’s not just the church. Perhaps the world is just becoming a less beautiful place. I believe this is reflected not only in the look of what mankind builds, but also in the fact our geographic expansion is simply paving-over creation — God’s handiwork. In that light, my strong conviction is that the church has an opportunity, even an obligation, to further set itself apart as a haven of beauty, art, music, and all manner of soulful expressions of truth, edification and worship. As the longest book in the Bible, Psalms, is a collection of lyrics and poetry. So the church should elevate the arts to be among the most important and prominent fruits of its efforts. Not the onlyfruit mind you, but a larger part than it currently represents. My personal experience has been that artists are most often treated as “resources” the church can use to set the stage for pastors to teach rather than seeing them as the means by which God can reach directly into the hearts of believers to draw true worship while allowing non-believers to encounter the Holy Spirit directly. Having experienced being a part of both artistic ministries and teaching ministries, I am interested in the differences in how they’re shepherded. In teaching-oriented ministries there is at least some measure of effort placed into building the necessary competence, theological understanding, devotional habits, accountability and discipleship skills. While in artistic ministry there is little, if any, focus on these things. The result of this is that the artistic community within the church is often not equally grounded spiritually, not truly equipped for ministry. The sad result of this is the number of moral failures I’ve seen among the ranks of artists. Crisis proportions in my view. While ultimately these are personal failures, the church bares a degree of responsibility as well. But the natural result of this is for church leadership to place less trust in the spiritual strength of their artists. A sad vicious cycle begins if we’re not careful.
There is hope though… there always is, because God is faithful even when we are not. I am encouraged that church leadership titles like “song leader” or even “director of music” are often being replaced by “pastor of worship arts” and a host of other titles that elevate the position and broaden its scope beyond just that of music. Of course, God cares nothing about titles, nor should we. But it represents a shift in thinking and a resetting of goals. Whether or not actual expectations, practices and results have changed is another matter. Success in this I think is far less common. What is required is not changes of title or even liturgical structure (though that may be a result.) As much as it might sound like I’m pinning the responsibility for change on senior church leadership, I’m not. Actually I think the change needs to start within the community of Christian artists and those who are responsible for music and artistic ministry. Recognize the awesome role you can play in the church. Certainly the support of the rest of church leadership will be needed along the way, but we need to demonstrate the impact we can have as we go. We also need to do the hard work of discipleship within our ranks. Of course, this starts with building habits in our own lives that match the lyrics we sing. Do we live like we’re “in love with Jesus?” Is He the air we “breath?” Do we honestly seek that He “open the eyes of our hearts?” As we seek to live it personally and then to sew it within the community of artists around us, God will elevate the resulting ministry. He loves to receive the praises of His people. No one is better equipped to express His praise than the artistic heart!
What is required of church leadership is to recognize that there is an artistic community around them. By nature, they’re among the least likely to assert their presence. But they have a unique and irreplaceable role in the church. Make sure you are seeking to grow, disciple, nurture, build, and use this community to glory of God.
In comments, I’d love to hear about places where this is going well.